The best way to motivate is to organize the job so that
doing it provides the feedback and challenge that helps satisfy the person’s
higher level needs for things like accomplishments and recognition. These needs
are relatively insatiable, so recognition and challenging work provide a sort
of built in motivation generator. Satisfying lower level needs for things like
better pay and working conditions just keep the person from becoming
dissatisfied.
The factors satisfy lower level needs are
different from those (motivators) that satisfy or partially satisfy higher
level needs. If hygiene factors (factors outside the job itself, such as
working conditions, salary and incentive pay) are inadequate employees become
dissatisfied. However adding more of this hygiene (like incentives) to the job
(supplying what Herzberg calls extrinsic motivation) is an inferior way to try
to motivate someone, because lower level needs are quickly satisfied. Soon the
person simply says in effect, what have you done for me lately? I want another
raise.
Instead of relaying on hygiene says Herzberg the
employer interested in creating a self motivated workforce should emphasize job
content or motivator factors. Managers do these enriching workers’ jobs so that
the jobs are more challenging and by providing feedback and recognition — make
the job itself intrinsically motivating in other words. Here the motivation in
a sense come from within the person and just dong the job provides the motivation.
Among other things Herzberg’s theory makes the point that relying exclusively
on financial incentives is risky. The employer should also provide the
recognition and challenging work that most people desire.
Psychologist Edward Sash’s work highlights
another potential downside to relying to heavily on extrinsic rewards: they may
backfire. Sash found that extrinsic rewards could at times actually detract
from the person’s intrinsic motivation. For example, a Samaritan who risks
danger by rushing to an accident victim’s aid might be insulted if the victim
said Thanks here’s some money for your trouble. The point may be stated thusly,
Be cautious in devising incentive pay for highly motivated employees lest you
advertently demean and detract from the desire they have to the do the job out
of a sense of responsibility.
Victor Vroom
Expectancy
A person’s expectation that his or her effort
will lead to performance
Instrumentality
The perceived relationships between successful
performance and obtaining the reward
The perceived value a person attaches to the
reward.
Another important motivational fact is that in
general people won’t pursue rewards they find unattractive or where the odds of
success are very low. Psychologist Victor Vroom’s motivation theory echoes
these commonsense observations. He says a person’s motivation to exert some
level of effort depends on three things: the person’s expectancy (in terms of
probability) that his or her effort will lead to performance; instrumentality or
the perceived connection (if any) between successful performance and actually
obtaining the rewards; and valence which represents the perceived value the
person attaches to the reward. In Vroom’s theory motivation is thus a product
of three things: Motivation = (E x I x V), where of course, E represents
expectancy), I instrumentality and V valence. If E or I or V is zero or
inconsequential there will be no motivation.
First, if employees don’t expect that effort
will produce performance, no motivation will occur. So, managers must ensure
that their employees have the skills to do the job, and believe they can do the
job. Thus training job descriptions and confidence building and support
Second, Vroom’s theory suggest that employees
must be see the instrumentality of their efforts – they must believe that
successful performance will in fact lead to getting the reward . Managers can
accomplish this, for instance by creating easy to understand incentive plans.
Third, the reward itself must be of value to the
employee. So ideally the manager should take individual employee preferences
into account. Endeavor to use extrinsic and intrinsic rewards that make sense
in terms of the specific behaviors you want to encourage.
No comments:
Post a Comment